photo courtesy: nesn.com
This is the real life John Cena, not the superhuman, heel-fighting, hero of children we see on TV.
Should this part of his life be kept out of WWE storylines or is this perfect material for one of his feuds?
WWE has often blurred the lines between reality and entertainment, works and kayfabe.
Scott Hall's real-life drinking problems were used as story material. WWE went the same direction with Road Animal Hawk, culling his drug issues for drama.
These are cases of sensitivity being drowned out by the roaring sound of greed. They're also more serious issues than Cena's divorce, but it's his own private mess.
WWE, never being a bastion of morality, should let their wrestlers suffer their personal pain without letting it become part of the script.
Liz Huberdeau isn't a WWE employee. She shouldn't be part of the show.
Should the creative team decide to bring in Cena's personal life into his feud with John Laurinaitis or with his next opponent, the story would write itself.
Cena's foe could play mind games with him in the way that Chris Jericho did with CM Punk during their rivalry.
It would be easy to use Cena's divorce to further his character or incite bad blood with someone, but it'd also be cheap.
Thanks in large part to the Internet, today's fans know full well what is storyline and what is real.
A kayfabe divorce angle wouldn't be a problem for most fans.
Were it to be derived from real life, a number of fans would squirm in discomfort. It wouldn't be anything compared to the Katie Vick incident; it would just be classless.
source: bleacherreport.com
