TNA ‘Turning Point’ PPV 2011 – the Good, Bad and Worst

Photo : impactwrestling.com

TNA Impact "Turning Point" assumed Sunday, Nov. 13, and every last trace of the titles, recovery one, were guarded. With a few brand new champions and a recovery of a preceding superstar, here is a get a load of the great, the disagreeable and the blah of TNA's latest PPV.

The Good
The PPV began with Eric Young at last losing the TNA TV title to Robbie E. I am not a tremendous fanatic of Robbie E but the sash was wasted around the waste of Young. The same amount as I cherish Young as a wrestler, he wasn't utilizing the title for anything alternate than drama grub. Confidently, Robbie E will treat it like a legitimate title.

Austin Aries is the best equipped thing concerning the X-Division at this very moment and he held his title in an a couple-route with Kid Kash and Jesse Sorensen. This was the most fit plausible determination but Aries requires some preferable rivalry down the line, perhaps Kazarian or Samoa Joe could be the best equipped fight for A Double.

The Rob Van Dam-Christopher Daniels match was as stupendous as looked for. I cherish how Daniels desired the no-DQ stipulation flung out since he is a wrestler and not a brawler but then tried for the unfamiliar question when the chips were down. A shrewd Christopher Daniels is a unbelievable Christopher Daniels. I unequivocally wish he could have won.

Bobby Roode beat AJ Styles in a World title match. The match kept ticking 20 moments, Styles worked his butt off and never endorsed his harmed lower leg to any detectable degree and they both looked like stars. Roode is morphing into an excellent unfavorable fellow champion and this may be the begin of a sport title rule for the man.

The Bad
Blood red and Matt Morgan seem to be constructed to look like creatures and that is magnificent. The closure of the match, with them unequivocally severely thrashing one another until the ref calls for the chime was terrific too, not counting this is a PPV. Fulfills similar to that are amazing for TV matches but PPV's require a more decisive summation.

The tag group match with Bully Ray and Scott Steiner in opposition to Mr. Anderson and Abyss was not particularly well done. The match was messy and more might as well have been expressed about several unbelievable tag crew wrestlers (Steiner and Ray) teaming up for what might have been a super group. Genuinely, Gunner ought to have been here rather than Steiner, but I don't know provided that it could have been any preferable. This was more of a gameplan to carry on Abyss' vendetta in opposition to Immortal than anything else.

Jeff Hardy beat Jeff Jarrett in five seconds. Jarrett desires a rematch, gets it and loses again in six moments. Then Jarrett ambushes when the match, interfaces with a major seat shot and after that works toward getting pinned a third time. I fathom they would like to prod Hardy again but this match ought to have been amazing and it was nothing something greater than a few squashes by Hardy.

The Worst
Mexican America shielded their tag group titles successfully in opposition to Ink Inc, and all I could probably trust is that this quarrel is at long last over with. My just situation here is resolving what tag crews are alternate in the once stupendous TNA tag crew division to fight for them?

Gail Kim beat Velvet Sky for the Knockouts title. I would be able to see them desiring to put the cinch on Kim in light of the fact that she is one of the best equipped wrestlers in the ladies' division but the development for Sky at long last getting her title is over with ridiculously brisk. This moreover makes me consider where the Karen Jarrett and Velvet Sky fight goes from here in consideration of Sky isn't the champion anymore.

Total Pageviews

Twitter

Disclaimer

We do not host any of the videos here. We only provide links to videos/embed videos. Those videos come directly from third party video hosting sites such as Dailymotion, YouTube, Cloudy, Movreel, and various other third party video hosting sites. Contact those sites for any video removals.

This website is NOT hosting any of the videos you see. Therefore, we are not responsible for the accuracy, compliance, copyright, legality, decency, or any other aspect of the content of other linked sites. If you have any legal issues please contact the appropriate media file owners/host sites. These videos are publicly available and you can contact the appropriate sites for removal.